Mar 31

Additional Options for Dynamic Iris and DBLE

Several forum members and users agree with the following: The latest firmware has tuned Dynamic Iris and DBLE (on/off) options conservatively and these should be "Default" settings for these modes respectively. However, it would be ideal to offer additional more aggressive parameters vs more conservative "Default" options. Here's our request: Dynamic Iris - Retain current (new) firmware setting as "Default" - offer additional "Low, Medium, High" settings in addition to default. "low would be very conservative that moves between just one or two Iris points where as "high" would move between F2.0 - F5.5 or even higher for example. The idea is to give people choice (while also keeping quality of materials and delivery in mind)DBLE - DBLE used to be offered in three different modes but just ON/OFF Now; the default on setting is very good albeit conservative. Similar to earlier selection we would like the currently configured setting to be "Default" but additional "Low, Med, High" options should a user want more aggressive settings (even if that comes at the expense of some artifacts they can tolerate). This would be particularly important for people with varying screen sizes, ambient light environments and also for folks using static iris + DBLE vs dynamic Iris to have better control in their environment. Overall - if XGIMI decide to give these options please ensure you leave current "dynamic" and DBLE settings in the new firmware untouched but simply renamed to "Default" while offering additional choices at user's own discretion.Thank you!
ReviewingReviewing

3 days ago

I think more control over the irises would be nice. Maybe something like the following. For static iris: Iris 1 F2 ─── F3 ─── F4 ─── F5.5 ─── F7 F2 Iris 2 F2 ─── F3 ─── F4 ─── F5.5 ─── F7 F5.5 Dynamic Iris example where a range could be set: Iris 1 F2 ─── F3 ─── F4 ─── F5.5 ─── F7 │===========│ F2 F4 Iris 2 F2 ─── F3 ─── F4 ─── F5.5 ─── F7 │=====│ F5.5 F7

3 days ago

Any update on this?

Apr 16, 2026

Labelling a system ‘conservative’ just because it is artifact-free doesn’t make sense to me. I don’t think we should assume that the engineers have deliberately left any artifact-free performance on the table. While I agree with having the system account for max brightness (given peoples’ screen sizes will vary), I don’t believe that adding in more aggressive, artifact-prone options is the right call. Each to their own, but I think engineering effort should focus on ensuring that the system is well and truly optimized (rather than trying to add more options).

Apr 16, 2026

My suggestion is to have two separate iris modes: 1. The current mode as the default. Let’s call it ‘Bright Iris’ 2. A darker mode to improve blacks and contrast, where the iris moves from F4.5 to F7.0. As for DBLE, I’d like to see four modes, as on the Nexigo: 1. Low – the current mode 2. Medium – slightly more aggressive 3. High – aggressive mode 4. Ultra – black is everything

Reviewing
changed status toUnder Review·Apr 10, 2026
Apr 9, 2026

Can you clarify if DBLE is only functional with Dynamic Iris, or if it can be enabled with a locked iris? If it’s only possible with Dynamic Iris, then please separate these as some users have concerns with their image being too bright!

Apr 9, 2026

I tested exactly this last night. DBLE is independent of dynamic iris. So you can turn DBLE on and off under any combination of iris and laser power setting.

Apr 9, 2026

Thank you 😊